An interdisciplinary look at a universal experience: food
By Donald Challenger
"Tell me what you eat," the pioneering food writer Jean Anthelme
Brillat-Savarin wrote in 1825, "and I will tell you what you are."
Given the dietary inclinations of most students, that's a risky
proposition on any college campus. But at Hamilton this spring, four
professors and 51 students took Brillat-Savarin's insight as a manifesto. In a new
sophomore seminar titled Food for Thought: The Science, Culture and
Politics of Food, they explored everything from the biochemistry of
nutrition to the corporate transformation of farming. And for some of
them, those pepperoni pizzas and Gummy Bears will never taste quite the
same.
Consider, for instance, the humble potato. It's one of four
occasional "roundtable" topics around which Food for Thought is
organized; the others are obesity, the Mediterranean diet and, as a
sort of late-semester dessert, chocolate. On an April afternoon, a
dozen students introduced their classmates to the pleasures and
particulars of the potato in a series of presentations stretching from
the Irish famine of the mid-19th century (a third of the population
died or fled) to the postmodern fast-food french fry in all its golden
glory (that entrancing perfume is synthesized at a plant on the New
Jersey Turnpike).
Science?
Potatoes are fat- and cholesterol-free until we start slathering on the
butter and sour cream, but -- Atkins disciples beware -- each packs an
average of 26 grams of carbohydrates. (Each also packs a few highly
toxic glycoalkaloids, but usually not enough to matter.) Culture? Van
Gogh chose not sunflowers or the firmament for his first great work,
but potatoes and the peasants who subsisted on them. The hardened faces
and pitiless gloom of his 1885 painting, The Potato Eaters, upended
many of the art world's conventions of class and color. Economics?
Idaho potato farmers are so efficient that they could give everyone on
the planet three pounds of potatoes annually, yet they are victims of
their own success, making just two cents on each $1.50 order of
fast-food fries. By the way, those fries are given their perfect
symmetry not by the human hand, but by a water cannon that slings hardy
Russet Burbanks through steel blades at nearly the speed of a Randy
Johnson fastball.
And Mr. Potato Head? Don't even start.
COMBINE INGREDIENTS AND MIX WELL
Food
is natural ground for an interdisciplinary approach. After all, our
very humanity is rooted in what and how we eat. "It is a less
intimidating subject than many, perhaps, because we've all got
experience with food," said Naomi Guttman, associate professor of
English. Guttman, who once "cooked and baked for a living and even
considered going to culinary school," conceived Food for Thought in the
fall of 2002 and was quickly joined by several colleagues who had been
thinking on parallel tracks. One, Shoshana Keller, had been toying with
the idea of using cookbooks from different cultures and eras as texts.
Keller also had been considering teaching a seminar on disease and
society. It was a good fit.
"One of our goals for the course,"
said Keller, associate professor of history, "has been to make the
students aware of the many economic, nutritional, political and
cultural factors that shape what they eat as individuals and how
American society views and uses food, and I think we've done that."
Sarah
Walsh finds that the smorgasbord approach works well. "We talk about
food in such a variety of contexts," the sophomore said. "We have
discussed the causes of famine in Third World countries, the art of the
restaurant review and the U.S. fast-food epidemic. This course would
lose its richness if it had to be classified under a single discipline."
Yet
with four professors and four fields figuring into the equation, a
sophomore seminar about food also demands focus. Without it, the course
might come to resemble one of those roadside diner menus with endless
laminated pages of omelets and club sandwiches -- all quantity, no
quality. After months of work, Guttman, Keller and their colleagues --
David Gapp, professor of biology, and Carol Drogus, professor of
government -- settled on four themes. Food and the body focused on
biology; food through time, on history; food and power, on politics;
and food and culture, on the arts and human activity. The entire course
would follow that broad sequence, they decided, but on most weeks
classes would meet in small sections of a dozen students, where
professors could employ their expertise, and students could define
their own interests and goals.
That mix has made for some
surprises. "I spend so much time fulfilling requirements for my major
and taking writing-intensive classes that I figured I earned myself a
semester with a class totally unrelated to my major," said Lisi
Krainer, a cultural anthropology major. Now, "Ironically, I realized
that food has a whole lot to do with my major." At one point she found
herself pushing her own limits to explain an archaeological theory,
with which she had only passing familiarity, not only to her fellow
students, but to a professor as well. She was, for that topic and that
moment, the resident expert.
"This pooling of students' and
professors' resources has forced me to make connections between
different and seemingly unrelated classes," Krainer added. "And I
believe that the ability to make these connections is ultimately one of
the most valuable lessons I learned in Food for Thought."
That
sense of mapping new territory as one ventures beyond one's comfort
zone is not just for students, Drogus said. Despite having
well-developed personal and professional interests in food -- she says
that "many of my closest friendships have been formed around food," and
she often incorporates hunger and global food issues into her courses
-- Drogus found that "there was a certain excitement for me in teaching
such a multifaceted course and getting ?outside our box.'"
One
way of putting it, Gapp said, is that the course is about both crossing
boundaries between disciplines and respecting them. "It's not difficult
conceptually," he said. "It's difficult because there's a language
barrier unless the faculty are in closely allied fields. But I think
the fun is finding the common ground. And there is a lot more of it
than we tend to think."
Right, fun. Have we mentioned the cooking?
SIMMER OVER A HOT STOVE
For a
course that is "not a cooking class," as the professors warn regularly,
there's a whole lot of cookin' goin' on. On top of roundtable reports
and frequent papers, students were responsible for a final project that
included a full group meal; in addition, several special outings during
the semester were devoted to trying recipes and picking up tips from
the pros at Bon Appétit food services. The standards, though,
admittedly leaned more toward hot cuisine than haute cuisine. One wry
assurance on the course syllabus notes that the grade for the final
meal "will include quality of planning and participation. It will not
include culinary quality of dishes prepared."
Nevertheless,
many students aimed high with their menus. Lisa Schaaf tackled Thai.
Jay Russell contemplated vichyssoise and chocolate souffle. Sarah Walsh
went Italian. Sarah Schmidt used an outing at Guttman's house early in
the semester to test-drive a recipe for salted cod from a medieval
cookbook. Lisi Krainer, who grew up in Austria, Hungary and Romania,
planned an "Around the World Dinner" with her group, from Moroccan
carrots to Aztec hot chocolate. "Although my project partners probably
have a very different view on this, I see this ?Around the World'
dinner almost as a representation of who I am," she said.
But the
real impact of Food for Thought is likely to go beyond a few exotic
recipes. Samir Majmudar was a vegetarian coming in -- "I like to think
I eat healthy when I do eat," he said -- but he is paying more
attention to advertising claims and food labels. "I've also tried to
convince my parents to start using more olive oil so that they can get
more monounsaturated fats, which are better than saturated fats," he
added. Krainer has dropped beef and pork from her diet and is "trying
to go completely vegetarian." Leigh Trucks, whose parents are caterers,
is making an effort to eat organic foods and avoid meat from animals
raised on antibiotics and hormones. And even those students who have
not made changes now see food production and marketing through clearer
eyes.
"I know that several of my kids who went to Hannaford
[supermarket] will never look at a grocery store quite the same way
again," Keller said of one field trip, "which was exactly the point."
... AND SERVE WITH GOOD CONVERSATION
Given
the state of the American diet and global food policy, much of any
course on eating is necessarily devoted to deconstruction --
dismantling the advertising pitches, disrupting the sheer force of
habit, questioning the myths that even the best intentions sustain.
"Over break, a student was telling her mother about how she would
instill good diet and taste in her future children by giving them a
wide variety of good foods from an early age," Keller recalled. "Her
mother laughed."
But for a subject as large as food, there is
much to be said for serendipity as well as skepticism. Amber Gillis, a
science major who took the course to expand her knowledge of the
chemistry of cooking, found herself fascinated by the history of food
preparation and eating habits as the semester unfolded. Lisa Schaaf,
who came to the course "to get a broader perspective" on her own love
of cooking, was drawn as well to the stories of female saints who "were
usually revered because of their ability to survive seemingly without
any food."
Guttman captured another side of this neglected
dimension of eating -- the communal, the soulful, the remembered -- as
she mused with students about Passover and the seder on a sunny April
afternoon. "There's something that taste does to us that stimulates the
spiritual in us," she said. "I find myself using that word -- spiritual
-- a lot when I talk about food."
That sense of exploration,
grounded in real experience yet venturing into what is unknown and
unspoken, ultimately made Food for Thought more than a mere
intellectual buffet.
Donald Challenger is a writer, editor and teacher who lives in Clinton, N.Y., and enjoys the occasional french fry.
(PHOTO: Giuseppe Arcimboldo. Summer. 1573. Oil on canvas. Louvre, Paris, France.)
Turning the Tables, Reversing the Roles
rop in on the four small-group sections of Food for Thought some afternoon, and you might have trouble matching the professor with the discipline. David Gapp, the biologist, is guiding his students through four centuries of still-life art, from the 16th-century Dutch market paintings of Pieter Aertsen to the contemporary work of Tom Wesselman. In one painting, Wesselman captures beer, cigarettes and submarine sandwiches in all their dubious glory. "That's what's become of the still life," Gapp observed as students laughed. "That says it all."
Across campus, Shoshana Keller, the historian, coaxes her section through a discussion of how literary conventions are used in Ruth Reichl's food memoir, Tender at the Bone: Growing Up at the Table. Naomi Guttman, poet and teacher of literature, is talking about per capita spending of food and the economics of bulk buying. And Carol Drogus, the political scientist, is encouraging her group to consider how the techniques of creative nonfiction can help readers "understand what it means to be hungry in a way statistics don't."
All interdisciplinary courses are intended to give students and professors a chance to operate outside the confines of a narrow specialty, but Food for Thought operates constantly on such leaps. "I think what you saw was pretty typical," Drogus said. Still, the professors are cautious about claims that four disciplines can be neatly integrated in a sophomore-level course. Keller, in fact, suggested that "multidisciplinary" might be a better description.
A few students, too, noted that "what sounds great on paper does not necessarily work out in the classroom" every week, as Lisi Krainer observed. Occasionally it's best to have an expert on hand to help students negotiate a complex topic. Even so, the excitement of an intellectual adventure is contagious.
"I'm a double archaeology and classical studies major, so needless to say, I've never taken a course in history, biology, English or government," Sarah Schmidt said. "So if I'm able to learn something about these disciplines through one of my favorite things in the world -- food -- then my response was an overwhelming ‘Sign me up!'"
Setting the Table for ‘Food for Thought'
ike any four-course meal, Food for Thought required some elaborate planning and time for the various ingredients to simmer and blend. Naomi Guttman, associate professor of English, set the table in the fall of 2002 with an e-mail to Hamilton faculty members asking if anyone was interested in developing a course on food for one of the College's required sophomore seminars. She heard first from David Gapp, professor of biology, who was interested in exploring plants and medicine from a historical point of view. "There are all sorts of wonderful things there -- references in Shakespeare, the history of drugs -- so when Naomi put out her query, it resonated," he said.
Carol Drogus, professor of government, and Shoshana Keller, associate professor of history, quickly followed; both were already incorporating food-related themes into their own classes. The four received a Richardson Grant to do research for the course, and by last fall they were meeting regularly to choose readings and develop the syllabus.
With four disciplines to integrate and a body of research and literature that could fill a library, "there were many choices to make, and it wasn't always easy," Guttman recalled. They settled on four general themes -- food and the body, food through time, food and power, and food and culture -- that intersected with four large "roundtable" gatherings on obesity, the Mediterranean diet, the potato and chocolate. The large-group meetings were balanced with more frequent smaller classes that shared a common syllabus but could also branch out in unique directions.
"This is the first chance I've had in my career to teach with other colleagues in this way, and it's been a great experience," Guttman said, and her colleagues echoed the sentiment. But with one semester of the course behind them, they will make a few changes in 2004-05. Two sections will be offered in the fall, with Guttman and Drogus teaching; in the spring, Keller will be on leave, so Gapp will team with Barbara Gold, professor of classics.