|
||
|
News
News Home Page
All News
Student Research
Faculty News
Hamilton In the News
Sports News
Events
Events Calendar
Performing Arts
Publications
Alumni Magazine
Alumni Books
Faculty Books
Student Media
For the Media
Contact Us
Experts
Youth Polls
For the Hamilton Community
Submit Professional News
Working with the Media
Of Special Interest
Excelsior Campaign
CollegeNews.org
Campus Sustainability
Campus Webcams
Building Dashboard
Contact Information
Media Relations Office
866-729-0313 315-859-4648 (fax) |
Hate Speech and its relationship to the Ward Churchill AffairHamilton College Statement
Contact: Mike DebraggioPhone: (315) 859-4680 March 3, 2005 Many sincere critics of Ward Churchill's appearance at Hamilton College have suggested that his 9/11 remarks represent "hate speech." They have asked why Churchill could not have been banned from the Hamilton campus on that basis. To be sure, Churchill's published views could hardly have been more hateful in their characterization of the victims of 9/11. But political speech one may have a justification for hating is not the same as "hate speech." The purpose of hate speech as a category of expression on a campus is to prevent the creation of an educational or social environment so hostile that abuse, oppression, or even raw intimidation, particularly of disfavored classes or groups, can overwhelm civil discourse and render learning and open discussion impossible. Depending on their nature, and the relationships between speaker and subject, certain types of hate speech -- such as speech and acts amounting to racial discrimination or sexual harassment in the workplace -- may actually be illegal under current state or federal law or regulations. On other occasions some of the most vocal critics of Ward Churchill, along with other observers, have noted that "hate speech" has the potential to be misused as a tool to suppress lawful expression or to impose forms of "political correctness" that may themselves be oppressive to some viewpoints on a campus. So it is essential to scrutinize closely any definition or application of "hate speech" to assure that it is not inappropriately or over-broadly used to censor open and robust debate of political ideas, however controversial or unpopular. When assessed according to these criteria, Ward Churchill's remarks on 9/11 can be seen for what they are -- hateful speech, politically offensive to the vast majority, but not "hate speech."
We have made news articles, editorials, and community- and public comments available through our news site. |
Upcoming Events8/30 - Emerson Gallery Pr... 8/30 - OPENING NIGHT: "Ac... 8/31 - 2008 US OPEN - Sun... More ...News HighlightsHamilton Receives NY Higher Education Capital Matching GrantHamilton College will receive $671,141 from the New York State Dormitory Authority for the purchase and installation of equipment at the Kirner-Johnson Building. KJ is undergoing extensive renovation, with Phase 1 work completed this month. The money will come from the authority's Higher Education Capital Matching Grant Program (HECAP), according to state Sen. Joseph Griffo, R-Rome, and state Assemblyman David Townsend, R-Sylvan Beach. More ...Women's lacrosse player appears in Sports IllustratedHamilton College women's lacrosse player Kaillie Briscoe '09 (Orangeville, Ontario/Orangeville District School)was one of six featured "Faces in the Crowd" in the August 25 issue of Sports Illustrated. More ... |
| Copyright © 2008 The Trustees of Hamilton College. All rights reserved. top of page | printable page | text: T T T | ||