|
||
|
Nesbitt-Johnston Writing Center Home About the Writing Center Writing Center History Celebrating 20 Years Alumni Review Article Essentials of Writing (Hamilton Style Guide) The Seven Deadly Sins of Writing Writing Intensive Guidelines |
||
Writing for Philosophy 110by Janette Schue (‘92), Monica Redstone Meier (‘97), and Sharon WilliamsGood writing is a key aspect of a well-argued philosophy paper. Like all other papers, philosophy papers should be well-planned and organized. Your language should be simple and direct, and your argument should be clear and well-supported. Avoid grandiose statements such as "Since the beginning of time, mankind has searched for Truth." When Evaluating a Philosophical Position:PrepareMake sure you are very familiar with the text on which you are writing, and develop your own opinion in response to the assignment. As Professor Rick Werner says, "If you try to write about something with which you are unfamiliar, it will sound hollow and superficial to the reader." Begin with a specific thesis statement, or claim, in mind. (You may choose to revise or clarify your thesis statement later.) Try to construct an outline of your essay before you begin writing.Explain the Writer's ArgumentExplain the writer's major premises and conclusion. This step may be relaxed or done subtly as long as you sufficiently explain the argument. If the argument is long or complex, you may decide to select only the premises necessary to your discussion. If you are writing an expository essay, strive to explain philosophical concepts clearly and thoroughly. If you are writing an argumentative essay, demonstrate the relation between your claim(s) and the author's by examples or analogies to support your thesis.Evaluate the Writer's ArgumentBe sure to state your thesis statement in the first paragraph. In the body of the paper, challenge yourself to examine both the strengths and the weaknesses of the argument, and provide evidence to support your claim. Consider the following questions in your evaluation:
If you think the argument is not sound, develop a major criticism of it. You can criticize an argument on at least two grounds: the content (truthfulness) of the premises, and the logical structure of the argument. Make the nature of your criticism clear in your discussion. Your evaluation of an argument should be judicious. Never claim to have "disproven" an argument when you have only pointed out the weaknesses in it. Always attempt to consider the opposing viewpoint in as charitable a way as possible; this will make your own criticisms appear stronger. You may examine more than one criticism, but all criticisms should be strong criticisms, and your treatment of them should be thorough. Avoid vagueness; be specific in your criticism or support of an argument. Opinions alone are not convincing; provide reasons. Cite specific language and develop specific examples that support your position. As you write, ask yourself the following questions:
Conclude Your DiscussionRemember that you do not necessarily have to come to a single conclusion; whether your conclusion is straightforward or complex, make sure that it is clearly explained and is supported by your argument.Special thanks to members of the Philosophy Department at Hamilton College: Kathryn Doran, Amie Macdonald, Mark Migotti, Andrew Norman, Robert Simon, and Richard Werner. |
HOURS: |
|
| Copyright © 2008 The Trustees of Hamilton College. All rights reserved. top of page | printable page | text: T T T | ||