Interdisciplinary Work, Collaboration, and Mentoring  ›  Disciplinary Analysis

* For help understanding this visualization, see "Guide" tab.
* To see the full name of column header, hover pointer over short name in external comparison column header.
 
 
Your results compared to PEERS   ◄
Your results compared to COHORT ►
Areas of strength in GREEN
Areas of concern in RED
Within campus differences
sm (.1)med. (.3)lrg. (.5)
 
mean
overall
Hum
Soc
Phy
Bio
VPA
ECM
HHE
Agr
Bus
Edu
Med
Oth
Hum vs other
Soc vs other
Phy vs other
Bio vs other
VPA vs other
ECM vs other
HHE vs other
Agr vs other
Bus vs other
Edu vs other
Med vs other
Oth vs other
2015
Interdisciplinary Work
2.80
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
other
 
 
Bio
other
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
 
Budgets encourage interdiscip. work
2.76
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
 
other
Phy
Bio
 
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
 
Facilities conducive to interdiscip. work
2.90
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
 
 
other
Bio
other
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
+
Interdiscip. work is rewarded in merit
2.70
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
other
 
other
Bio
other
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
+
Interdiscip. work is rewarded in promotion
2.78
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
 
 
other
N<5
other
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
 
Interdiscip. work is rewarded in tenure
2.32
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
Hum
other
other
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
Dept. knows how to evaluate interdiscip. work
3.04
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
other
other
Phy
Bio
VPA
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
 
Collaboration
3.69
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
Hum
other
other
 
 
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
 
Opportunities for collab. within dept
3.75
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
Hum
other
other
Bio
VPA
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
 
Opportunities for collab. outside inst
3.74
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
Hum
 
other
other
 
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
 
Opportunities for collab. outside dept
3.49
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
 
other
Phy
 
other
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
 
Mentoring
3.67
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
 
other
Phy
other
VPA
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
 
Effectiveness of mentoring within dept.
4.01
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
 
other
Phy
other
VPA
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
+
Effectiveness of mentoring outside dept.
3.83
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
other
 
Phy
other
VPA
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
 
Mentoring of pre-tenure faculty in dept
3.91
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
Hum
other
 
VPA
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
 
Mentoring of tenured associate profs in dept
3.21
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
other
other
Phy
N<5
VPA
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
 
Support for faculty to be good mentors
3.24
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
 
other
 
N<5
other
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
+
Related Survey Items
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
Interdiscip. work is rewarded in reappointment
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N/A
Being a mentor is fulfilling
4.28
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
other
 
Phy
N<5
other
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
 
Effectiveness of mentoring outside the inst.
4.15
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
other
Soc
other
 
VPA
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
 
Mentoring of NTT faculty in dept
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N/A
Interest in interdisciplinary work
3.35
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
other
Soc
 
Bio
 
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N/A