Shared Governance  ›  Disciplinary Analysis

* For help understanding this visualization, see "Guide" tab.
* To see the full name of column header, hover pointer over short name in external comparison column header.
 
 
Your results compared to PEERS   ◄
Your results compared to COHORT ►
Areas of strength in GREEN
Areas of concern in RED
Within campus differences
sm (.1)med. (.3)lrg. (.5)
 
mean
overall
Hum
Soc
Phy
Bio
VPA
ECM
HHE
Agr
Bus
Edu
Med
Oth
Hum vs other
Soc vs other
Phy vs other
Bio vs other
VPA vs other
ECM vs other
HHE vs other
Agr vs other
Bus vs other
Edu vs other
Med vs other
Oth vs other
2015
Governance: Trust
3.66
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
 
Soc
other
other
other
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
+
I understand how to voice opinions about policies
3.75
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
 
Soc
other
other
other
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
 
Clear rules about the roles of faculty and administration
3.59
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
other
Soc
 
other
other
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
+
Faculty and admin follow rules of engagement
3.99
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
other
Soc
other
other
other
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
+
Faculty and admin have an open system of communication
3.40
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
 
Soc
other
other
 
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
+
Faculty and admin discuss difficult issues in good faith
3.76
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
Hum
Soc
other
other
other
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
+
Governance: Shared Sense of Purpose
3.59
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
Hum
Soc
other
other
other
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
+
Important decisions are not made until there is consensus
3.25
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
Hum
Soc
other
other
other
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
+
Admin ensures sufficient time for faculty input
3.40
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
 
Soc
other
other
 
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
+
Faculty and admin respectfully consider the other's view
3.81
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
other
Soc
other
other
other
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
+
Faculty and admin have a shared sense of responsibility
4.03
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
 
Soc
other
other
other
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
+
Governance: Understanding the Issue at Hand
3.42
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
other
Soc
 
other
other
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
+
Faculty governance structures offer opportunities for input
3.52
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
 
Soc
 
other
other
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
+
Admin communicate rationale for important decisions
3.50
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
other
Soc
other
 
other
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
+
Faculty and admin have equal say in decisions
3.23
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
other
Soc
other
Bio
other
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
+
Faculty and admin define decision criteria together
3.60
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
other
Soc
other
N<5
other
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
+
Governance: Adaptability
3.03
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
other
Soc
 
other
other
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
+
Shared governance holds up in unusual circumstances
3.21
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
Hum
 
Phy
other
other
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
+
Institution regularly reviews effectiveness of governance
2.68
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
other
Soc
other
Bio
other
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
+
Institution cultivates new faculty leaders
3.20
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
 
Soc
 
other
other
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
+
Governance: Productivity
3.43
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
other
Soc
Phy
other
other
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
+
Overall effectiveness of shared governance
3.46
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
 
Soc
 
 
other
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
+
My committees make measureable progress towards goals
3.62
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
Hum
other
Phy
Bio
other
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
+
Public recognition of progress
3.25
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
other
Soc
Phy
 
other
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
+