Appreciation and Recognition  ›  Demographic Analysis

* For help understanding this visualization, see "Guide" tab.
* To see the full name of column header, hover pointer over short name in external comparison column header.
 
 
Your results compared to PEERS   ◄
Your results compared to COHORT ►
Areas of strength in GREEN
Areas of concern in RED
Within campus differences
sm (.1)med. (.3)lrg. (.5)
 
mean
overall
tenured
pre-ten
ntt
full
assoc
men
women
white
foc
asian
urm
ten vs pre-ten
ten vs ntt
full vs assoc
men vs women
white vs foc
white vs asian
white vs urm
2015
Appreciation and Recognition
3.55
N/A
pre-ten
N/A
 
women
foc
asian
urm
+
Recognition: For teaching
3.75
N/A
 
N/A
 
women
white
asian
white
+
Recognition: For advising
3.03
N/A
tenured
N/A
 
women
white
 
white
+
Recognition: For scholarship
3.59
N/A
pre-ten
N/A
assoc
women
foc
asian
urm
 
Recognition: For service
3.20
N/A
 
N/A
 
women
foc
asian
urm
 
Recognition: For outreach
3.14
N/A
pre-ten
N/A
assoc
women
 
white
 
+
Recognition: From colleagues
3.79
N/A
 
N/A
assoc
women
 
 
 
 
Recognition: From CAO
3.64
N<5
N/A
N<5
N/A
assoc
women
foc
asian
urm
+
Recognition: From Dean
3.77
N<5
N/A
N<5
N<5
N/A
assoc
 
foc
N<5
urm
+
Recognition: From Head/Chair
4.01
N/A
pre-ten
N/A
 
women
 
white
 
+
School/college is valued by Pres/Provost
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Dept. is valued by Pres/Provost
3.58
N<5
N/A
N<5
N/A
assoc
women
foc
asian
urm
+
CAO cares about faculty of my rank
3.71
N/A
pre-ten
N/A
 
women
foc
asian
urm
+