Institutional Leadership  ›  Demographic Analysis

* For help understanding this visualization, see "Guide" tab.
* To see the full name of column header, hover pointer over short name in external comparison column header.
 
 
Your results compared to PEERS   ◄
Your results compared to COHORT ►
Areas of strength in GREEN
Areas of concern in RED
Within campus differences
sm (.1)med. (.3)lrg. (.5)
 
mean
overall
tenured
pre-ten
ntt
full
assoc
men
women
white
foc
asian
urm
ten vs pre-ten
ten vs ntt
full vs assoc
men vs women
white vs foc
white vs asian
white vs urm
2015
Leadership: Senior
3.51
N/A
pre-ten
N/A
full
women
 
asian
 
+
Pres/Chancellor: Pace of decision making
3.60
N/A
pre-ten
N/A
assoc
women
 
asian
white
+
Pres/Chancellor: Stated priorities
3.33
N/A
pre-ten
N/A
assoc
women
 
asian
 
+
Pres/Chancellor: Communication of priorities
3.52
N/A
 
N/A
 
women
foc
asian
urm
+
CAO: Pace of decision making
3.59
N/A
pre-ten
N/A
full
 
 
asian
 
+
CAO: Stated priorities
3.44
N/A
pre-ten
N/A
full
 
 
 
white
+
CAO: Communication of priorities
3.63
N/A
pre-ten
N/A
full
 
 
white
urm
+
CAO: Ensuring faculty input
3.56
N/A
pre-ten
N/A
full
women
 
 
 
+
Leadership: Divisional
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Dean: Pace of decision making
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Dean: Stated priorities
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Dean: Communication of priorities
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Dean: Ensuring faculty input
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Leadership: Departmental
4.06
N/A
 
N/A
 
women
 
asian
 
+
Head/Chair: Pace of decision making
4.10
N/A
 
N/A
 
women
 
asian
white
+
Head/Chair: Stated priorities
3.83
N/A
pre-ten
N/A
 
women
 
asian
 
+
Head/Chair: Communication of priorities
3.96
N/A
 
N/A
assoc
women
 
asian
white
+
Head/Chair: Ensuring faculty input
4.21
N/A
 
N/A
 
women
white
white
 
+
Head/Chair: Fairness in evaluating work
4.20
N/A
 
N/A
 
women
 
 
white
+
Leadership: Faculty
3.28
N/A
tenured
N/A
 
women
 
asian
white
+
Faculty leaders: Pace of decision making
3.21
N/A
tenured
N/A
assoc
 
 
asian
white
+
Faculty leaders: Stated priorities
3.14
N/A
tenured
N/A
 
women
 
asian
white
 
Faculty leaders: Communication of priorities
3.20
N/A
 
N/A
 
women
 
asian
 
 
Faculty leaders: Ensuring faculty input
3.59
N/A
 
N/A
 
women
foc
asian
 
+
Related Survey Items
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
Priorities are stated consistently
2.92
N/A
pre-ten
N/A
full
women
foc
asian
urm
+
Priorities are acted on consistently
2.88
N/A
pre-ten
N/A
full
women
foc
asian
urm
+
Changed priorities negatively affect my work
3.27
N/A
pre-ten
N/A
 
women
foc
asian
urm
+
CAO: Support in adapting to change
2.71
N/A
N<5
N<5
pre-ten
N/A
full
women
foc
N<5
N<5
+
Visible leadership for support of diversity
3.99
N/A
pre-ten
N/A
 
women
foc
asian
urm
+