91B0FBB4-04A9-D5D7-16F0F3976AA697ED
C9A22247-E776-B892-2D807E7555171534
David Wippman.
 “U.S. government officials have long recognized that what Americans don’t know about foreign languages, cultures, and histories, has — and will — hurt us,” began President David Wippman and his co-author Cornell Professor Glenn Altschuler in a Jan. 29 op-ed in The Hill. The essay chronicles legislation in the 20th and 21st centuries focused on Americans’ increased knowledge of other countries and their languages.

“Funding for such efforts, which has never been adequate, has declined precipitously in recent years, putting the country’s national security and economic competitiveness at risk,” the authors wrote. “Just 20 percent of American K-12 students study a foreign language. Only about 7 percent study foreign languages in college and the number who do is declining.”

The authors pointed to issues arising from Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, heightened economic and military competition with China, nuclear brinksmanship by North Korea, and the continued threat of international terrorism, as evidence now that increased government support for the study of foreign languages, history, politics, and culture is essential.

The two authors also expressed their opinion in reaction to an essay titled When colleges take political positions, they show who isn’t wanted in The Washington Post by columnist George Will. Published on Jan. 27 under the title What belongs in marketplaces of ideas?,” they responded, “George F. Will is half right: Colleges and universities that take institutional positions on public controversies do risk inhibiting the unfettered inquiry and debate that should be central to campus life.

“But we believe leaders in higher education should weigh in on campus free speech, affirmative action, visa and immigration policies affecting students, faculty or staff, and other issues that have a direct and significant impact on their operations or higher education” they wrote.   

 The authors contend “…It is therefore entirely appropriate, and indeed incumbent, on colleges and universities to address the impact of the Supreme Court’s Dobbs decision on the reproductive health services they provide or, for institutions with medical schools, on the training they offer.”

Related News

winter view from inside the Chapel

Faculty, Students, and Alumni in the News - February 2024

National and regional news organizations regularly interview Hamilton faculty, staff, alumni, and students for their expertise and perspectives on current events, and to feature programs and activities on campus. February’s news topics included the economy, Black history, and a new college president, among others.

January snowfall on campus

Hamilton in the News - January 2024

National and regional news organizations regularly interview Hamilton faculty, staff, alumni, and students for their expertise and perspectives on current events, and to feature programs and activities on campus. January’s news topics included DEI policies, prison writing, and book banning, among others.

Help us provide an accessible education, offer innovative resources and programs, and foster intellectual exploration.

Site Search